Pulido v. CHRONES

567 F.3d 1142, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12688, 2009 WL 1588671
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 9, 2009·No. 05-15916, 05-16308·Published

Opinion

ORDER

Petitioner-Appellant’s Petition for Reconsideration of Dispositive Order, filed with this court on March 31, 2009 is GRANTED. The Order remanding the case, filed March 20, 2009 is VACATED.

Petitioner-Appellant’s Motion to file Supplemental Brief Following Supreme Court Remand, filed March 10, 2009 is GRANTED and Petitioner-Appellant’s Supplemental Brief is ordered FILED.

Respondent-Appellant is directed to file a responsive brief to Petitioner-Appellee’s Supplemental Brief to address the application of the harmless error standard of Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619, 113 S.Ct. 1710, 123 L.Ed.2d 353 (1993). Respondent-Appellant shall respond within fourteen (14) days of the date of this order, and Respondent-Appellant shall provide this court with ten (10) copies.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pulido v. CHRONES, 567 F.3d 1142, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 12688, 2009 WL 1588671 (9th Cir. 2009).

567 F.3d 1142 (Pulido v. CHRONES) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brecht v. Abrahamson
507 U.S. 619 (Supreme Court, 1993)