Pulido v. Chrones

Ninth Circuit

Pulido v. Chrones

559 F.3d 1040, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5825, 2009 WL 723989

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 20, 2009

DocketNos. 05-15916, 05-16308

StatusPublished

This text of 559 F.3d 1040 (Pulido v. Chrones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pulido v. Chrones, 559 F.3d 1040, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5825, 2009 WL 723989 (9th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

In light of Hedgpeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 530, — L.Ed.2d — [1041]*1041(2008), which vacated the judgment of this court, 487 F.3d 669, and remanded, we in turn remand this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court’s determination that the appropriate standard of review in a case under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 is harmless error, rather than structural error, when a jury is instructed on alternative theories of guilt.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

In light of Hedgpeth v. Pulido, 555 U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 530, — L.Ed.2d — [1041]*1041(2008), which vacated the judgment of this court, 487 F.3d 669, and remanded, we in turn remand this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court’s determination that the appropriate standard of review in a case under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 is harmless error, rather than structural error, when a jury is instructed on alternative theories of guilt.

REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 F.3d 1040, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 5825, 2009 WL 723989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pulido-v-chrones-ca9-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack