Pugh v. Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2005·No. 04-8023·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-8023

PHILLIP MORRIS PUGH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GENE JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-1347)

Submitted: March 24, 2004 Decided: March 31, 2005

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Morris Pugh, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Phillip Morris Pugh appeals the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Pugh v. Johnson, No. CA-04-1347 (E.D. Va. filed Nov.

22, 2004; entered Nov. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pugh v. Johnson, (4th Cir. 2005).

Pugh v. Johnson (Pugh v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related