Pugh v. Johnson
This text of Pugh v. Johnson (Pugh v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-8023
PHILLIP MORRIS PUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GENE JOHNSON, Director, Department of Corrections,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-1347)
Submitted: March 24, 2004 Decided: March 31, 2005
Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Phillip Morris Pugh, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Phillip Morris Pugh appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Pugh v. Johnson, No. CA-04-1347 (E.D. Va. filed Nov.
22, 2004; entered Nov. 23, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Pugh v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pugh-v-johnson-ca4-2005.