Puente v. Puente
16 P.R. 807
Opinion
Motion denied, the court stating in its decision that when the appellant fails in his duty to present a complete and faithful transcript the respondent is not bound to supply his omission; but, for this reason alone, may move for the dismissal of the appeal should something necessary and material to its decision be lacking, and the documents were refused admission because they had been presented too late.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Puente v. Puente, 16 P.R. 807 (prsupreme 1910).
16 P.R. 807 (Puente v. Puente) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.