Public Service Railaway Co. v. Banker

93 N.J. Eq. 461, 8 Stock. 461
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided December 5, 1921·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The court being equally divided upon the question whether there shall be an affirmance or a reversal, the decrees appealed from will be affirmed.

For affirmance — Swayze, Trencitakd, Parker, Kalisch, Black, White, Ackebson — 7. Fo reversal — Ti-ie Ci-iiee-Justice, Bergen, Minturn, Katzenbacii, Heppentieimer, Williams, Gardner — 7.

[462] In these cases the following opinions were filed:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Public Service Railaway Co. v. Banker, 93 N.J. Eq. 461, 8 Stock. 461 (N.J. 1921).

93 N.J. Eq. 461 (Public Service Railaway Co. v. Banker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mosig v. Jersey Chiropodists, Inc.
194 A. 248 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1937)
Junction Water Co. v. Riddle
155 A. 887 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1931)