Public Service Co. of Okla. v. Vinita

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Public Service Co. of Okla. v. Vinita

1943 OK 105, 135 P.2d 57, 192 Okla. 291, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 135

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 16, 1943

DocketNo. 30695.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 1943 OK 105 (Public Service Co. of Okla. v. Vinita) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Public Service Co. of Okla. v. Vinita, 1943 OK 105, 135 P.2d 57, 192 Okla. 291, 1943 Okla. LEXIS 135 (Okla. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiffs in error have appealed from an adverse judgment in an action to enjoin the sale of certain bonds for the erection of a power plant. The defendants in error have filed a confession of error asking that the judgment for the defendants in error be reversed and remanded, with directions to enter a judgment for plaintiffs in error.

We have held that where the defendant in error files a confession of error which is reasonably sustained by the record, this court may reverse and remand the cause in accordance with the confession of error. Board of Com’rs of Seminole County v. Seminole Gas Co., 188 Okla. 363, 109 P. 2d 488; O’Dell v. Sharp, 182 Okla. 534, 78 P. 2d 810.

The confession of error is reasonably sustained by the record. The cause is therefore reversed and remanded, with directions to the trial court to enter judgment for the plaintiffs in error in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and RILEY, OSBORN, WELCH, BAYLESS, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI