Earley v. Baughman

1948 OK 237, 199 P.2d 210, 200 Okla. 649, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 398
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 3, 1948·No. No. 33743·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendants, Edward Earley et al., from a judgment enforcing a restrictive covenant against the sale of real property to members of the Negro race. The defendants in error have filed here[650]*650in a confession of error, citing in support thereof Shelley v. Kraemer, 92 L. Ed. 845, which case was decided after the rendition of the judgment appealed from. The confession of error is reasonably sustained by the record, and the judgment should be reversed. Public Service Co. v. City of Vinita, 192 Okla. 291, 135 P. 2d 57.

Reversed, with directions to dismiss the cause.

HURST, C. J., DAVISON, V. C. J., and RILEY, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Earley v. Baughman, 1948 OK 237, 199 P.2d 210, 200 Okla. 649, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 398 (Okla. 1948).

1948 OK 237 (Earley v. Baughman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Tulsa v. Carr
2008 OK CIV APP 24 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2008)