Earley v. Baughman

1948 OK 237, 199 P.2d 210, 200 Okla. 649, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 398
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedNovember 3, 1948
DocketNo. 33743
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1948 OK 237 (Earley v. Baughman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Earley v. Baughman, 1948 OK 237, 199 P.2d 210, 200 Okla. 649, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 398 (Okla. 1948).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendants, Edward Earley et al., from a judgment enforcing a restrictive covenant against the sale of real property to members of the Negro race. The defendants in error have filed here[650]*650in a confession of error, citing in support thereof Shelley v. Kraemer, 92 L. Ed. 845, which case was decided after the rendition of the judgment appealed from. The confession of error is reasonably sustained by the record, and the judgment should be reversed. Public Service Co. v. City of Vinita, 192 Okla. 291, 135 P. 2d 57.

Reversed, with directions to dismiss the cause.

HURST, C. J., DAVISON, V. C. J., and RILEY, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Tulsa v. Carr
2008 OK CIV APP 24 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1948 OK 237, 199 P.2d 210, 200 Okla. 649, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/earley-v-baughman-okla-1948.