Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Public Administrator v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

Public Administrator v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

192 A.D.2d 325, 595 N.Y.S.2d 478
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 192 A.D.2d 325 (Public Administrator v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Public Administrator v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States, 192 A.D.2d 325, 595 N.Y.S.2d 478 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.), entered April 15, 1992, which denied a motion and cross-motion for an order in limine precluding plaintiff’s introduction of evidence of his decedent’s future lost earnings, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree that the plaintiff administrator should be permitted to offer evidence of any wages that his decedent, an alien working in the United States on an apparently illegal basis, might have earned. Any pertinent evidence is competent unless prohibited by statute (see, Freeman v Corbin Ave. Bus Co., 60 AD2d 824, 825, lv denied 44 NY2d 649). It is for the jury to weigh defense proof that decedent would have earned those wages, if at all, by illegal activity (see, Spadaccini v Dolan, 63 AD2d 110, 124).

In tort cases, beginning with Barker v Kallash (63 NY2d 19, 24-25), the criminal nature of an act has been held to preclude recovery of damages based on the consequences of that act [326]*326only where the act is a serious crime that directly caused the injuries (see also, Izzo v Manhattan Med. Group, 164 AD2d 13, 18, amended 169 AD2d 428, lv dismissed 77 NY2d 989).

No different result is required by the public policy disfavoring enforcement of contracts for illegal activity (see, McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465, 469). The record does not support a conclusion, as a matter of law, that decedent’s allegedly illegal conduct amounted to serious crimes that directly caused his injuries. To the extent that Collins v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp. (151 Misc 2d 266 [Sup Ct, Queens County], adhered to on rearg 151 Misc 2d 270) is inconsistent, we decline to follow it. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Kupferman, Asch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jose Raimundo Madeira v. Affordable Housing Foundation, Inc., and Mountain Developers Associates, Llc, Defendants-Third-Party-Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, Preferred National Insurance Co., Third-Party-Defendant-Appellee v. Cleidson C. Silva, Doing Business as C & L Construction, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellant
469 F.3d 219 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Madeira v. Affordable Housing Foundation, Inc.
469 F.3d 219 (Second Circuit, 2006)
Balbuena v. IDR REALTY LLC
845 N.E.2d 1246 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
Oro v. 23 East 79th Street Corp.
10 Misc. 3d 82 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Majlinger v. Cassino Contracting Corp.
25 A.D.3d 14 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Rosa v. Partners in Progress, Inc.
868 A.2d 994 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 2005)
Balbuena v. IDR Realty LLC
13 A.D.3d 285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Sanango v. 200 East 16th Street Housing Corp.
15 A.D.3d 36 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Madeira v. Affordable Housing Foundation, Inc.
315 F. Supp. 2d 504 (S.D. New York, 2004)
Majlinger v. Cassino Contracting Corp.
1 Misc. 3d 659 (New York Supreme Court, 2003)
Singh v. Dresswood Management Corp.
253 A.D.2d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Mazur v. Rock-McGraw, Inc.
246 A.D.2d 515 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Mischalski v. Ford Motor Co.
935 F. Supp. 203 (E.D. New York, 1996)
Klapa v. O & Y Liberty Plaza Co.
168 Misc. 2d 911 (New York Supreme Court, 1996)
Avendano v. Sazerac, Inc.
221 A.D.2d 395 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Collins v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.
201 A.D.2d 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Gomez v. Long Island Railroad
201 A.D.2d 455 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 A.D.2d 325, 595 N.Y.S.2d 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/public-administrator-v-equitable-life-assurance-society-of-united-states-nyappdiv-1993.