(PS) Ysaguirre v. Rodriguez
Opinion
LAID YSAGUIRRE, 1:23-cv-00254-HBK (PC)
Plaintiff, v. ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE SACRAMENTO DIVISION R. RODRIGUEZ, and SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, Defendants. Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, accompanied with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. Nos. 1, 2). The complaint alleges violations of Plaintiff’s civil rights by defendants. The alleged violations took place in Sacramento County, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the complaint should have been filed in the Sacramento Division. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b); see also Ziegler v. Indian River County, 64 F.3d 470, 474 (9th Cir. 1995) (reviewing federal court jurisdiction and venue in a § 1983 action). The Court finds it in the interests of justice to transfer this case to the Sacramento Division under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) and Local Rule 120(f). The court will not rule on plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. The Clerk of Court shall TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento Division; and A 2. All future filings shall refer to the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 3. The court defers the ruling on plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis to the transferee court. Dated: __February 22, 2023 Kole N.fareA Zaskth D HELENA M. BARCH-KUCHTA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PS) Ysaguirre v. Rodriguez ((PS) Ysaguirre v. Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.