(PS) Sanders v. Hunter

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CURTIS DANE SANDERS, No. 2:23-CV-0293-TLN-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MICHELLE HUNTER, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Curtis Dane Sanders (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings this civil action 18 under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the California Unruh Act. The matter was referred 19 to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On January 24, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which 21 were served on the parties, and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within 22 fourteen (14) days. No objections have been filed. 23 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 24 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. 25 See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the 26 magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court[.]”). 27 Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by 28 the record and by the proper analysis. 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 24, 2025, (ECF No. 14), are 3 ADOPTED in full; 4 2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 11, is GRANTED; and 5 3. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 6 | Date: March 28, 2025 4 9 10 TROY L. NUNLEY CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28