(PS) Hyon v. Brown

District Court, E.D. California·Decided May 26, 2021·No. 2:19-cv-00259·Unknown

Opinion

Junho Hyon, No. 2:19-cv-00259-KJM-EFB Plaintiff, ORDER v. Jerry Brown, et al., 1S Defendants. This court ordered plaintiff's case be closed on March 12, 2020, ECF No. 21. Plaintiff subsequently appealed that Order, ECF No. 26. The Ninth Circuit dismissed plaintiff's appeal for lack of jurisdiction, ECF Nos. 29 & 30. On May 3, 2021, this court denied plaintiff's motion for clarification, ECF No. 32. Plaintiff moves to dismiss defendants and remand case, ECF No. 35. See Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (“document filed pro se is ‘to be liberally construed’”) (citations omitted). Given the implausible nature of plaintiff's contentions, see generally Compl., ECF No. 1, the court DENIES plaintiffs request because it does not appear the litigation has any merit. This order resolves ECF No. 35. DATED: May 25, 2021. CHIEF STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PS) Hyon v. Brown, (E.D. Cal. 2021).

(PS) Hyon v. Brown ((PS) Hyon v. Brown) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Erickson v. Pardus
551 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 2007)