(PS) Atlas Lifting & Rigging, LLC v. Berner

• Court: District Court, E.D. California
• Decided: August 30, 2023
• Docket: 2:23-cv-00808
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Atlas Lifting & Rigging, LLC, No. 2:23-cv-00808-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 Vv. Trevor Berner et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 In this diversity action, plaintiff Atlas Lifting & Rigging, LLC (“Atlas”) brings several 18 | state law claims against defendants Trevor Berner and Synergy Marketing & Sales, Inc. 19 | (“Synergy”). See Compl., ECF No. 1. Berner has appeared in this action and is proceeding pro 20 | se. See Answer, ECF No. 6. Synergy has not appeared. 21 A corporation or other entity may not appear without an attorney. D-Beam Ltd. P’ship v. 22 | Roller Derby Skates, Inc., 366 F.3d 972, 973-74 (9th Cir. 2004); see E.D. Cal. L.R. 183(a). 23 | However, a sole proprietorship may be represented in pro per by its owner. Sharemaster v. U.S. 24 | Sec. & Exch. Comm’n, 847 F.3d 1059, 1066 & n.4 (9th Cir. 2017). 25 In this action, Synergy is identified as a corporation, “Synergy Marketing & Sales, Inc.,” 26 | Compl. 9/3. Though Atlas alleges Synergy has been suspended since 2017, id. 4 3, Atlas also 27 | alleges Berner is doing business as “Synergy Marketing & Sales, LLC,” id. § 21, and also alleges,

1 inconsistently, that Synergy is a sole proprietorship with “Berner [] believed to be a sole 2 proprietor doing business as Synergy,” id. ¶ 10. 3 Within 21 days, the parties shall meet and confer and file a joint statement clarifying 4 their respective positions or joint position regarding whether Synergy is a corporation or a sole 5 proprietorship. If Synergy is a sole proprietorship, the joint statement shall clarify whether 6 Berner will be representing Synergy in pro per in his capacity as the sole proprietor. If Synergy is 7 a corporation, the joint statement shall propose a date by which Synergy must obtain counsel. 8 Failure to obtain counsel as a corporate entity may subject Synergy to the entry of default and 9 default judgment against it. See Caveman Foods, LLC v. jAnn Payne’s Caveman Foods, LLC, 10 No. 12-1112, 2015 WL 6736801, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2015). 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 DATED: August 30, 2023.