Pruett v. State
This text of 89 S.E. 378 (Pruett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Upon the trial of a criminal case, relevant incriminatory evidence procured by an unlawful search of the defendant’s premises is admissible in evidence against him. Duren v. City of Thomasville, 125 Ga. 1 (53 S. E. 14). See also Smith v. State, 144 Ga. 679 (87 S. E. 893); Id. 17 Ga. App. 693 (88 S. E. 42).
2. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the conviction of the accused, and the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the petition for certiorari. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.E. 378, 18 Ga. App. 313, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pruett-v-state-gactapp-1916.