Prudential Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Flanigan
This text of 478 U.S. 1311 (Prudential Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Flanigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The application for a writ of injunction pending appeal is denied. The constitutional issues addressed in the application were not properly presented to the Montana Supreme Court until the applicants filed for rehearing. The court denied the petition for rehearing without comment, consistent with its practice of refusing to consider issues not pressed at each stage of the litigation. See Femling v. Montana State University, - Mont. -, 713 P. 2d 996, 999 (1986); Dodd v. East Helena, 180 Mont. 518, 523, 591 P. 2d 241, 244 (1979). Under these circumstances, the claims presented by the applicants are not properly before me. “Questions first presented to the highest State court on a petition for rehearing come too late for consideration here . . . .” Radio Station WOW, Inc. v. Johnson, 326 U. S. 120, 128 (1945).
Denied.
*1312 [[Image here]]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
478 U.S. 1311, 107 S. Ct. 38, 92 L. Ed. 2d 761, 55 U.S.L.W. 3238, 1986 U.S. LEXIS 2863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prudential-federal-savings-loan-association-v-flanigan-scotus-1986.