Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Greenspoon & Marder, P.A.
551 So. 2d 584, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2530, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6059, 1989 WL 129047
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 1989·No. No. 89-0123·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
We reverse the order of the trial court granting an injunction and remand. The order fails to specify adequate reasons for its entry. See Allegra Enterprises, Inc. v. Fairchild, 455 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(c). See also Seashore Club of Atlantic City, Inc. v. Tessler, 405 So.2d 767 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We do not address whether there is evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion or the other issues raised on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Greenspoon & Marder, P.A., 551 So. 2d 584, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2530, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6059, 1989 WL 129047 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
551 So. 2d 584 (Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Greenspoon & Marder, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hopkins v. Hopkins
623 So. 2d 586 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)