Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Greenspoon & Marder, P.A.
This text of 551 So. 2d 584 (Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc. v. Greenspoon & Marder, P.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
We reverse the order of the trial court granting an injunction and remand. The order fails to specify adequate reasons for its entry. See Allegra Enterprises, Inc. v. Fairchild, 455 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(c). See also Seashore Club of Atlantic City, Inc. v. Tessler, 405 So.2d 767 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). We do not address whether there is evidence to support the trial court’s conclusion or the other issues raised on the merits.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
551 So. 2d 584, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2530, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6059, 1989 WL 129047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prudential-bache-securities-inc-v-greenspoon-marder-pa-fladistctapp-1989.