Prowitz v. Ridgefield Park Village
584 A.2d 782, 122 N.J. 199, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 7
Opinions
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 237 NJ.Super. 435, 568 A.2d 114 (1989).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prowitz v. Ridgefield Park Village, 584 A.2d 782, 122 N.J. 199, 1991 N.J. LEXIS 7 (N.J. 1991).
584 A.2d 782 (Prowitz v. Ridgefield Park Village) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
R Realty LLC v. Little Falls Township
New Jersey Tax Court, 2018
The Senior Citizens Center of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of St. Volodimir V.Township of Franklin
New Jersey Tax Court, 2018
Vena v. Borough of North Haledon.
New Jersey Tax Court, 2017
Elizabeth Center Apartments Urban-Renewal Corp. v. City of Elizabeth
28 N.J. Tax 280 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2014)
Elizabeth Center Apartments Urban Renewal Corp. v. City of Elizabeth
27 N.J. Tax 196 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2013)
All Monmouth Landscaping & Design, Inc. v. Manalapan Township
23 N.J. Tax 250 (New Jersey Tax Court, 2006)
Penns Grove Gardens Ltd. v. Penns Grove Borough
18 N.J. Tax 253 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1999)
78 South First Street Housing Development Fund Corp. v. Commissioner of Finance
202 A.D.2d 115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. East Amwell Township
13 N.J. Tax 24 (New Jersey Tax Court, 1992)
Prowitz v. Ridgefield Park Village
584 A.2d 782 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1991)