Prov. Wor. R.R. Co.
21 A. 965, 17 R.I. 324, 1891 R.I. LEXIS 27
Opinions
Exceptions overruled, and judgment of the Special Court of Common Pleas dismissing the proceeding for want of jurisdiction affirmed. This court concurs in and adopts the opinion by Tillinghast, J., given in the court below.
Benjamin N. Lapham Edwin Metcalf, for petitioner.
J.H. Benton, Jun., for respondents, the Boston Providence R.R. Corp. and the Providence, Warren Bristol R.R. Co.
The opinion given in the court below is as follows: —
March 22, 1890.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prov. Wor. R.R. Co., 21 A. 965, 17 R.I. 324, 1891 R.I. LEXIS 27 (R.I. 1891).
21 A. 965 (Prov. Wor. R.R. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilmans v. Peoples Building & Loan Ass'n
97 S.W.2d 930 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1936)
City of Richmond v. Carneal
106 S.E. 403 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1921)
School Board of Harrisonburg v. Alexander
101 S.E. 349 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1919)