Protests 975245-G of Ditbro Pearl Co.
18 Cust. Ct. 165
Opinion
Opinion by
It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of beads similar in all material respects to those the subject of Eitinger Bead Co., Inc. v. United States (17 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1020) and Eitinger Bead Co. v. United [166] States (13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867). In accordance therewith, the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1503, or at 20 percent under the same paragraph, as modified by T. D. 49458, was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Protests 975245-G of Ditbro Pearl Co., 18 Cust. Ct. 165 (cusc 1947).
18 Cust. Ct. 165 (Protests 975245-G of Ditbro Pearl Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States
13 Cust. Ct. 50 (U.S. Customs Court, 1944)
Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States
17 Cust. Ct. 56 (U.S. Customs Court, 1946)