Protests 964576-G of Hollander Bead & Novelty Corp.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 964576-G of Hollander Bead & Novelty Corp.

14 Cust. Ct. 203

United States Customs Court·Decided February 14, 1945·No. No. 50013·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the beads m question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), certain of the items were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 and others at 20 percent under the same paragraph as modified by T. D. 49458. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the beads m question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), certain of the items were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 and others at 20 percent under the same paragraph as modified by T. D. 49458. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Protests 964576-G of Hollander Bead & Novelty Corp., 14 Cust. Ct. 203 (cusc 1945).

Pincite

14 Cust. Ct. 203 (Protests 964576-G of Hollander Bead & Novelty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related