Protests 3900-K of Frankel Importing Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 3900-K of Frankel Importing Co.

14 Cust. Ct. 176

United States Customs Court·Decided December 22, 1944·No. No. 49890·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In view of stipulation of counsel that certain of the items consist of beads wholly or in chief value of glass similar to those involved in Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), some of the items were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 and others at 20 percent [177]*177under the same paragraph as modified by the said trade agreement, and as set out in schedule attached to decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In view of stipulation of counsel that certain of the items consist of beads wholly or in chief value of glass similar to those involved in Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), some of the items were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 and others at 20 percent [177]*177under the same paragraph as modified by the said trade agreement, and as set out in schedule attached to decision.

Protests 3900-K of Frankel Importing Co., 14 Cust. Ct. 176 (cusc 1944).

Pincite

14 Cust. Ct. 176 (Protests 3900-K of Frankel Importing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related