Protests 22340-K of Samuel Barotz & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 22340-K of Samuel Barotz & Co.

14 Cust. Ct. 177

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 22, 1944

DocketNo. 49891

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Cust. Ct. 177 (Protests 22340-K of Samuel Barotz & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 22340-K of Samuel Barotz & Co., 14 Cust. Ct. 177 (cusc 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In view of stipulation of counsel that certain of the items consist of beads wholly or in chief value of glass similar to those involved in Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), some of the items were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 and others at 20 percent under the same paragraph as modified by the. said trade agreement, and as set out in schedule attached to decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In view of stipulation of counsel that certain of the items consist of beads wholly or in chief value of glass similar to those involved in Eitinger Bead Co. v. United States (13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), some of the items were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 and others at 20 percent under the same paragraph as modified by the. said trade agreement, and as set out in schedule attached to decision.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Cust. Ct. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-22340-k-of-samuel-barotz-co-cusc-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack