Protests 161520-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 161520-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

4 Cust. Ct. 370

United States Customs Court·Decided January 19, 1940·No. No. 43046·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that the merchandise consists of filet laces, lace window curtains, Normandy laces, and embroidered articles similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Billwiller v. United States (T. D. 44911), United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544). The claim as embroidered at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that the merchandise consists of filet laces, lace window curtains, Normandy laces, and embroidered articles similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Billwiller v. United States (T. D. 44911), United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544). The claim as embroidered at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Protests 161520-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 370 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 370 (Protests 161520-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related