Protests 161520-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protests 161520-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

4 Cust. Ct. 370

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 19, 1940

DocketNo. 43046

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 370 (Protests 161520-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protests 161520-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 370 (cusc 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that the merchandise consists of filet laces, lace window curtains, Normandy laces, and embroidered articles similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Billwiller v. United States (T. D. 44911), United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544). The claim as embroidered at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that the merchandise consists of filet laces, lace window curtains, Normandy laces, and embroidered articles similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), Billwiller v. United States (T. D. 44911), United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544). The claim as embroidered at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cust. Ct. 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protests-161520-g-of-r-h-macy-co-cusc-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack