Protest 952075-G of Hirsch's Sons

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 952075-G of Hirsch's Sons

2 Cust. Ct. 564

United States Customs Court·Decided January 30, 1939·No. No. 40554·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered ornaments, bandings, and insertings the same as those passed upon in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544), and embroidered-net ornaments similar to those the subject of United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered ornaments, bandings, and insertings the same as those passed upon in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544), and embroidered-net ornaments similar to those the subject of United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31 as claimed.

Protest 952075-G of Hirsch's Sons, 2 Cust. Ct. 564 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

2 Cust. Ct. 564 (Protest 952075-G of Hirsch's Sons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related