Protest 952075-G of Hirsch's Sons

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 952075-G of Hirsch's Sons

2 Cust. Ct. 564

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJanuary 30, 1939

DocketNo. 40554

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cust. Ct. 564 (Protest 952075-G of Hirsch's Sons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 952075-G of Hirsch's Sons, 2 Cust. Ct. 564 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered ornaments, bandings, and insertings the same as those passed upon in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544), and embroidered-net ornaments similar to those the subject of United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered ornaments, bandings, and insertings the same as those passed upon in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544), and embroidered-net ornaments similar to those the subject of United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those passed upon in Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31 as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cust. Ct. 564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-952075-g-of-hirschs-sons-cusc-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack