Protest 89263-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 362
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedAugust 28, 1939
DocketNo. 41997
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 362 (Protest 89263-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protest 89263-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 362 (cusc 1939).

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of Normandy laces similar to those involved in Amrein v. United States (T. D. 49551), filet laces like those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), veils the same as those involved in United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809), and an embroidered dress in part of lace similar to that passed upon in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544). On the established facts the claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Smith & Co.
12 Ct. Cust. 384 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cust. Ct. 362, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-89263-g-of-r-h-macy-co-cusc-1939.