Protest 83232-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 450
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedOctober 18, 1939
DocketNo. 42503
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 450 (Protest 83232-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Protest 83232-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 450 (cusc 1939).

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Amrein v. United States (T. D. 49551) and United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) Normandy laces and dresses in part of lace, embroidered, were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Smith & Co.
12 Ct. Cust. 384 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Cust. Ct. 450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-83232-g-of-r-h-macy-co-cusc-1939.