Protest 74235-G of R. H. Macy & Co.
This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 357 (Protest 74235-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as follows: Normandy laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), lace window curtains the same as those passed upon in Billwiller v. United States (T. D. 44911), filet articles like those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), articles embroidered and in part of lace like the merchandise involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544), and embroidered silk veils similar to those the subject of United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Cust. Ct. 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-74235-g-of-r-h-macy-co-cusc-1939.