Protest 74235-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 74235-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 357

United States Customs Court·Decided August 23, 1939·No. No. 41977·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as follows: Normandy laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), lace window curtains the same as those passed upon in Billwiller v. United States (T. D. 44911), filet articles like those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), articles embroidered and in part of lace like the merchandise involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544), and embroidered silk veils similar to those the subject of United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as follows: Normandy laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), lace window curtains the same as those passed upon in Billwiller v. United States (T. D. 44911), filet articles like those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), articles embroidered and in part of lace like the merchandise involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544), and embroidered silk veils similar to those the subject of United States v. Ramig (17 C. C. P. A. 365, T. D. 43809).

Protest 74235-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 357 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 357 (Protest 74235-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related