Protest 38863-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 38863-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

1 Cust. Ct. 499

United States Customs Court·Decided November 23, 1938·No. No. 39920·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those the subject of Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31. Silk wearing apparel in part of galloons, embroidered, like that involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and Pustet v. United States (13 id. 530, T. D. 41396) was held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those the subject of Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31. Silk wearing apparel in part of galloons, embroidered, like that involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and Pustet v. United States (13 id. 530, T. D. 41396) was held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430.

Protest 38863-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 1 Cust. Ct. 499 (cusc 1938).

Pincite

1 Cust. Ct. 499 (Protest 38863-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related