Protest 23278-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 23278-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.

3 Cust. Ct. 328

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJuly 10, 1939

DocketNo. 41813

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 328 (Protest 23278-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 23278-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc., 3 Cust. Ct. 328 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel certain articles embroidered and in part of lace similar to those involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and Pustet v. United States (13 id. 530, T. D. 41396), Normandy laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and filet laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel certain articles embroidered and in part of lace similar to those involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and Pustet v. United States (13 id. 530, T. D. 41396), Normandy laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and filet laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Cust. Ct. 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-23278-g-of-abraham-straus-inc-cusc-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack