Protest 23278-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 23278-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.

3 Cust. Ct. 328

United States Customs Court·Decided July 10, 1939·No. No. 41813·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel certain articles embroidered and in part of lace similar to those involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and Pustet v. United States (13 id. 530, T. D. 41396), Normandy laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and filet laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel certain articles embroidered and in part of lace similar to those involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and Pustet v. United States (13 id. 530, T. D. 41396), Normandy laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), and filet laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 id. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.

Protest 23278-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc., 3 Cust. Ct. 328 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 328 (Protest 23278-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related