Protest 219941-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 219941-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

4 Cust. Ct. 348

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 22, 1939

DocketNo. 42898

StatusPublished

This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 348 (Protest 219941-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Protest 219941-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 348 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Prom the record it was found that certain items consist of Normandy laces similar to those involved in United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), filet laces like those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), and pillow cases embroidered and in part of lace like those passed upon in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Prom the record it was found that certain items consist of Normandy laces similar to those involved in United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), filet laces like those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), and pillow cases embroidered and in part of lace like those passed upon in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

4 Cust. Ct. 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-219941-g-of-r-h-macy-co-cusc-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack