Protest 219941-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 219941-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

4 Cust. Ct. 348

United States Customs Court·Decided December 22, 1939·No. No. 42898·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Prom the record it was found that certain items consist of Normandy laces similar to those involved in United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), filet laces like those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), and pillow cases embroidered and in part of lace like those passed upon in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Prom the record it was found that certain items consist of Normandy laces similar to those involved in United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), filet laces like those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065), and pillow cases embroidered and in part of lace like those passed upon in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544). The claim at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 was therefore sustained.

Protest 219941-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 348 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

4 Cust. Ct. 348 (Protest 219941-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related