Protest 197759-G of R. H. Macy & Co.
4 Cust. Ct. 348
This text of 4 Cust. Ct. 348 (Protest 197759-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Protest 197759-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 4 Cust. Ct. 348 (cusc 1939).
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel Normandy laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) and lace articles like those passed upon in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430 as claimed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Smith & Co.
12 Ct. Cust. 384 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1924)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 Cust. Ct. 348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-197759-g-of-r-h-macy-co-cusc-1939.