Protest 159634-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 159634-G of R. H. Macy & Co.

3 Cust. Ct. 342

United States Customs Court·Decided August 7, 1939·No. No. 41893·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) Normandy laces were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Embroidered shirts .and dresses similar to those involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and lace window curtains similar to those the subject <of Billwiller v. United States (T. D. 44911) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers the same as those the subject of Robinson-■Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable At 60 percent' under paragraph 1419.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) Normandy laces were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Embroidered shirts .and dresses similar to those involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and lace window curtains similar to those the subject <of Billwiller v. United States (T. D. 44911) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers the same as those the subject of Robinson-■Goodman v. United States (17 C. C. P. A. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable At 60 percent' under paragraph 1419.

Protest 159634-G of R. H. Macy & Co., 3 Cust. Ct. 342 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 342 (Protest 159634-G of R. H. Macy & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related