Protest 111724-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.
This text of 3 Cust. Ct. 353 (Protest 111724-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion by
In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered articles similar to those involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and Pustet v. United States (13 id. 530, T. D. 41396), Normandy laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), embroidered scarfs in part of beaded fringes, and filet lace articles similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those the subject of Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Cust. Ct. 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/protest-111724-g-of-abraham-straus-inc-cusc-1939.