Protest 111724-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.

U.S. Customs Court

Protest 111724-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.

3 Cust. Ct. 353

United States Customs Court·Decided August 18, 1939·No. No. 41953·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered articles similar to those involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and Pustet v. United States (13 id. 530, T. D. 41396), Normandy laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), embroidered scarfs in part of beaded fringes, and filet lace articles similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those the subject of Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered articles similar to those involved in United States v. Smith (12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 384, T. D. 40544) and Pustet v. United States (13 id. 530, T. D. 41396), Normandy laces similar to those the subject of United States v. Amrein (26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40), embroidered scarfs in part of beaded fringes, and filet lace articles similar to those the subject of United States v. Jabara (22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Merchandise in chief value of cellulose filaments the same as those the subject of Abstract 37230 was held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 31.

Protest 111724-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc., 3 Cust. Ct. 353 (cusc 1939).

Pincite

3 Cust. Ct. 353 (Protest 111724-G of Abraham & Straus, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related