Proprietors of Township Number Six v. Jones
This text of 12 Mass. 334 (Proprietors of Township Number Six v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The statute of limitations of real actions
To avoid this obvious difficulty, however, the demandants have en[295]*295deavoured to commence their title as late as the year 1795, and then alleging that the Commonwealth was the * owner [* 337 ] until that time, they infer that no disseizin could have taken place before, and that since that period a sufficient time to bar them of their claim has not elapsed.
But their title commenced in 1762, by the grant of the provincial legislature, which, although depending upon the approbation of the Crown, which was never obtained, conveyed a seizin to the proprietors ; and the resolves of the legislature, after the Revolution, both in terms and legal effect, amounted to a confirmation of a defeasible title before existing. Their seizin, therefore, commenced in 1762 ; and, being disseized in 1767, and never afterwards having reinstated themselves by entry or otherwise, they cannot recover in this action.
Judgment on the verdict.
Stat. 1786. - 13.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 Mass. 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/proprietors-of-township-number-six-v-jones-mass-1815.