Prophet v. Supreme Court of California
This text of 302 F. App'x 658 (Prophet v. Supreme Court of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
California state prisoner Joseph Danny Prophet appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.
The district court properly dismissed the action because Prophet did not exhaust his state court remedies before filing a petition in the district court. See Davis v. Silva, 511 F.3d 1005, 1008 (9th Cir.2008).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
302 F. App'x 658, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prophet-v-supreme-court-of-california-ca9-2008.