Property Group, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
617 A.2d 167, 224 Conn. 912, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 391
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 18 (AC 10367), is granted, limited to the following question:
“Under the facts of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the planning and zoning commission did not have the authority to condition its approval of the plaintiff’s subdivision application on the plaintiff’s widening of a public highway abutting the proposed subdivision?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Property Group, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 617 A.2d 167, 224 Conn. 912, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 391 (Colo. 1992).
617 A.2d 167 (Property Group, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Property Group, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning Commission
628 A.2d 1277 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)