Prolitec, Inc. v. Scentair Technologies, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Prolitec, Inc. v. Scentair Technologies, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJune 9, 2015

Docket15-1017

StatusUnpublished

This text of Prolitec, Inc. v. Scentair Technologies, Inc. (Prolitec, Inc. v. Scentair Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Prolitec, Inc. v. Scentair Technologies, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

PROLITEC, INC., Appellant

v.

SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee ______________________

2015-1017 ______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013- 00180. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

ERIKA ARNER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Gar- rett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by J. DEREK MCCORQUINDALE; CORY C. BELL, Boston, MA.

JOSHUA B. POND, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also repre- sented by ADAM HOWARD CHARNES, Winston-Salem, NC; DAVID CLAY HOLLOWAY, TIFFANY L. WILLIAMS, Atlanta, GA. ______________________

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 9, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI