Progress Michigan v. Attorney General

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided September 25, 2019·No. 158151·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 25, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

158150-1 David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra PROGRESS MICHIGAN, Richard H. Bernstein Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices v SC: 158150-1 COA: 340921; 340956 Court of Claims: 17-000093-MZ ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

By order of March 20, 2019, we granted leave to appeal the June 19, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals, and this case was placed on the October 2019 session calendar for argument and submission. On September 3, 2019, the parties filed a joint motion to vacate the Court of Appeals opinion and remand the case to be dismissed with prejudice. By order of September 16, 2019, oral argument was adjourned. We DIRECT the parties to file supplemental briefs within 21 days of the date of this order addressing: (1) what standard should govern vacatur of lower court decisions in Michigan, see, e.g., US Bancorp Mortgage Co v Bonner Mall Partnership, 513 US 18, 29 (1994); California ex rel State Lands Comm v Superior Court of Sacramento Co, 11 Cal 4th 50, 60-62 (1995); and (2) whether, under the appropriate standard, this Court should vacate the judgment of the Court of Appeals reported at 324 Mich App 659 (2018).

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 25, 2019 t0918 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Progress Michigan v. Attorney General, (Mich. 2019).

Progress Michigan v. Attorney General (Progress Michigan v. Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Progress Michigan v. Attorney General
922 N.W.2d 654 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2018)