Progress Michigan v. Attorney General

923 N.W.2d 886
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 20, 2019
Docket158151
StatusPublished

This text of 923 N.W.2d 886 (Progress Michigan v. Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Progress Michigan v. Attorney General, 923 N.W.2d 886 (Mich. 2019).

Opinion

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 19, 2018 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall address: (1) whether there is a sovereign or governmental immunity defense to the failure to disclose public records pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), MCL 15.231 et seq . ; (2) if so, whether that immunity is waived by the FOIA; (3) whether the notice and verification requirements of the Court of Claims Act, see MCL 600.6431(1), are applicable to a FOIA appeal; (4) if so, whether the Court of Appeals erred when it held that the plaintiff's failure to follow the verification requirement in its original complaint, which was filed within one year after the FOIA claim accrued, MCL 600.6431(1), rendered the complaint "invalid from its inception" and incapable of amendment; and (5) whether the Court of Appeals erred when it held that the verified amended complaint, also filed within the one-year period, could not "relate back" to the date of the original complaint for purposes of compliance with the 180-day limitations period of the FOIA.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
923 N.W.2d 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/progress-michigan-v-attorney-general-mich-2019.