Pritchard v. Southern Company Svs.
This text of 92 F.3d 1130 (Pritchard v. Southern Company Svs.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
No. 95-6312.
Sue PRITCHARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SOUTHERN COMPANY SERVICES, Don Welliver, and Jeff Prince, Defendants-Appellees.
Dec. 13, 1996.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama. (No. CV 94-N-475-S), Edwin L. Nelson, Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
(Opinion Aug. 28, 1996, 11th Cir., 1996, 92 F.3d 1130)
Before CARNES, Circuit Judge, and FAY and GIBSON*, Senior Circuit Judges.
ORDER:
Appellees' Petition for Rehearing is denied except as to a
modification of the last paragraph of our opinion clarifying the
status of the individual officers of Southern Company Services,
Inc. Part IV Conclusion is amended to read:
IV. CONCLUSION
We conclude that the District Court erred when it granted SCSI
summary judgment under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act. We
REVERSE that part of its decision. We AFFIRM summary judgment in
favor of SCSI as to the Title VII claim, and we also affirm summary
judgment in favor of Don Welliver and Jeff Prince as to all
claims.1
* Honorable John R. Gibson, Senior U.S. Circuit Judge for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation. 1 Pritchard's remedy for any discrimination she may have suffered on account of her alleged disability lies against her employer, not individual officers of her employer. See Mason v. Stallings, 82 F.3d 1007, 1009 (11th Cir.1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 F.3d 1130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pritchard-v-southern-company-svs-ca11-1996.