Priscilla Alden Beach v. Oneida National Bank and Trust Company of Central New York (Successor to Rome Trust Company) and Johnson D. McMahon
This text of 305 F.2d 826 (Priscilla Alden Beach v. Oneida National Bank and Trust Company of Central New York (Successor to Rome Trust Company) and Johnson D. McMahon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Priscilla Alden BEACH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ONEIDA NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF CENTRAL NEW YORK
(successor to Rome Trust Company) and Johnson D.
McMahon, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 381, Docket 27548.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued June 11, 1962.
Decided June 11, 1962.
Robert L. Collins, Red Bank, N.J. (Harold Blodgett, Schenectady, N.Y., on brief), for plaintiff-appellant.
James T. Griffin (O'Shea, Griffin, Jones & McLaughlin, Rome, N.Y.), for defendant-appellee Oneida National Bank & Trust Co. of Central New York.
Donald L. Austin, Rome, N.Y. (Johnson D. McMahon, Rome, N.Y.), for defendant-appellee Johnson D. McMahon.
Before FRIENDLY, KAUFMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment in open court. The claim with respect to ownership of the stock was properly dismissed for reasons well stated in Judge Brennan's memorandum-decision of December 18, 1961, 206 F.Supp. 508. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence sufficient to warrant submission to the jury of her claim for breach of trust, fraud, and conspiracy in the administration of the trust.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
305 F.2d 826, 1962 U.S. App. LEXIS 4849, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/priscilla-alden-beach-v-oneida-national-bank-and-trust-company-of-central-ca2-1962.