Beach v. Oneida National Bank & Trust Co.
305 F.2d 826
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 11, 1962·No. No. 381, Docket 27548·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm the judgment in open court. The claim with respect to ownership of the stock was properly dismissed for reasons well stated in Judge Brennan’s memorandum-decision of December 18, 1961, 206 F.Supp. 508. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence sufficient to warrant submission to the jury of her claim for breach of trust, fraud, and conspiracy in the administration of the trust.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Beach v. Oneida National Bank & Trust Co., 305 F.2d 826 (2d Cir. 1962).
305 F.2d 826 (Beach v. Oneida National Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Priscilla Alden Beach v. Oneida National Bank and Trust Company of Central New York (Successor to Rome Trust Company) and Johnson D. McMahon
305 F.2d 826 (Second Circuit, 1962)