Home/Second Circuit/Beach v. Oneida National Bank & Trust Co.

Beach v. Oneida National Bank & Trust Co.

305 F.2d 826
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJune 11, 1962
DocketNo. 381, Docket 27548
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 305 F.2d 826 (Beach v. Oneida National Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Beach v. Oneida National Bank & Trust Co., 305 F.2d 826 (2d Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment in open court. The claim with respect to ownership of the stock was properly dismissed for reasons well stated in Judge Brennan’s memorandum-decision of December 18, 1961, 206 F.Supp. 508. Plaintiff failed to adduce evidence sufficient to warrant submission to the jury of her claim for breach of trust, fraud, and conspiracy in the administration of the trust.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Priscilla Alden Beach v. Oneida National Bank and Trust Company of Central New York (Successor to Rome Trust Company) and Johnson D. McMahon
305 F.2d 826 (Second Circuit, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 F.2d 826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/beach-v-oneida-national-bank-trust-co-ca2-1962.