Prince v. State
421 So. 2d 791, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28179
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 16, 1982·No. No. AO-111·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In an appeal from the denial of a motion for post-conviction relief or correction of sentence, appellant complains that the trial court erred in making a recommendation pertaining to parole in an order relating to sentencing. Sentencing judges have traditionally made recommendations as to incarceration and parole. While the recommendation has no binding effect, since the Parole and Probation Commission determines who shall be placed on parole and the time and conditions of parole. Section 947.13, Florida Statutes, no error was committed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Prince v. State, 421 So. 2d 791, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28179 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).
421 So. 2d 791 (Prince v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Easton v. State
472 So. 2d 1369 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)