Prince v. State

398 So. 2d 976, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19749
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 13, 1981·No. No. WW-347·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of multiple convictions and sentences which we affirm except as to the trial judge’s retention of jurisdiction, pursuant to Section 947.16(3) Florida Statutes, for review of any parole release order. This statute was enacted subsequent to the commission of the offenses in the present case and, since it substantively alters appellant’s situation to his disadvantage, retroactive application of the provision would be ex post facto in effect and is thus impermissible. State v. Williams, 397 So.2d 663 (Fla.1981), 6 FLW 263; Rodriquez v. State, 380 So.2d 1123 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1980); cf., Weaver v. Graham, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 960, 67 L.Ed.2d 17 (1980).

Accordingly, we reverse insofar as the trial judge retained jurisdiction to review [977] parole release orders, and remand the cause for deletion of that portion of the orders of commitment. The judgments of conviction and sentences are otherwise affirmed.

SHIVERS and WENTWORTH, JJ., and WILLIAM C. OWEN, Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prince v. State, 398 So. 2d 976, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19749 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

398 So. 2d 976 (Prince v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Florida Parole Com'n
625 So. 2d 926 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Hubbard v. State
411 So. 2d 1312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)