Prince George's Cnty. v. Thurston
This text of 271 A.3d 791 (Prince George's Cnty. v. Thurston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Circuit Court for Prince George’s County Case No. CAL22-01728 Argued: March 4, 2022
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND
No. 63
September Term, 2021
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY
v.
ROBERT E. THURSTON, et al.
Getty, C.J., Watts Hotten Booth Biran Gould McDonald, Robert N. (Senior Judge, Specially Assigned) JJ.
PER CURIAM ORDER
Filed: March 7, 2022
Pursuant to Maryland Uniform Electronic Legal Materials Act (§§ 10-1601 et seq. of the State Government Article) this document is authentic.
2022-03-07 13:23-05:00
Suzanne C. Johnson, Clerk PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY * IN THE
* COURT OF APPEALS
v. * OF MARYLAND
* COA-REG-0063-2021
* No. 63
ROBERT E. THURSTON, et al. * September Term, 2021
Upon consideration of the filings by Prince George’s County, Petitioner, and Robert
E. Thurston, et al., Respondents, and oral argument conducted in the above-captioned case
on March 4, 2022,
WHEREAS, on January 31, 2022, the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County
issued an “Order of Court and Declaratory Judgment,” permanently enjoining Prince
George’s County, Maryland and the Prince George’s County Council from implementing
or otherwise presenting the redistricting plan passed by resolution in CR-123-2021 to any
entity charged with acting upon or implementing the County’s redistricting plan,
WHEREAS, the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County ordered that the
redistricting plan in CR-123-2021 be immediately withdrawn and that the Prince George’s
County Redistricting Commission’s plan be submitted to all entities charged with acting
upon or implementing the County’s redistricting plan,
WHEREAS, the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County ordered that any
publication of the redistricting plan in CR-123-2021 immediately cease and desist or that the plan be otherwise withdrawn from public view to the extent practicable and within the
control of the County and/or Council,
For reasons to be stated later in an opinion to be filed, it is this 7th day of March,
2022,
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the “Order of Court and
Declaratory Judgment” issued on January 31, 2022 by the Circuit Court for Prince
George’s County, be, and it is hereby, AFFIRMED in all respects; and it is further
ORDERED, that the redistricting plan prepared by the Commission and submitted
to the Council on September 1, 2021, which became effective by operation of law under
Section 305 of the Charter for Prince George’s County on November 30, 2021, shall be
used for all purposes in acting upon or implementing the County’s redistricting plan; and
it further
ORDERED, that costs are to be paid by the Petitioner and the mandate is to issue
forthwith.
/s/ Joseph M. Getty Chief Judge
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
271 A.3d 791, 477 Md. 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prince-georges-cnty-v-thurston-md-2022.