Primm v. State
641 So. 2d 930, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8105, 1994 WL 440574
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Primm v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2267 →
Opinion
We find appellant’s Notice of Appeal to be timely filed pursuant to Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla.1992).
Having considered appellant’s brief and the record, we find no error in the trial court’s denial of appellant’s criminal rule 3.850 motion without evidentiary hearing.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Primm v. State, 641 So. 2d 930, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8105, 1994 WL 440574 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
641 So. 2d 930 (Primm v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Haag v. State
591 So. 2d 614 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)