Primm v. State

610 So. 2d 32, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12476, 1992 WL 352999
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Primm v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2267
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 2, 1992·No. No. 91-1964·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

AFFIRMED. Under the facts of this case, the trial court’s instruction on flight constituted harmless error. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). See also Young v. State, 601 So.2d 636 (Fla. 4th DCA1992).

Affirmed.

GUNTHER, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Primm v. State, 610 So. 2d 32, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12476, 1992 WL 352999 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

610 So. 2d 32 (Primm v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. State
601 So. 2d 636 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)