Primm v. State

610 So. 2d 32, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12476, 1992 WL 352999
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 2, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1964
StatusPublished

This text of 610 So. 2d 32 (Primm v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Primm v. State, 610 So. 2d 32, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12476, 1992 WL 352999 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

AFFIRMED. Under the facts of this case, the trial court’s instruction on flight constituted harmless error. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). See also Young v. State, 601 So.2d 636 (Fla. 4th DCA1992).

Affirmed.

GUNTHER, DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Young v. State
601 So. 2d 636 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
State v. DiGuilio
491 So. 2d 1129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
610 So. 2d 32, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12476, 1992 WL 352999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/primm-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.