Primerica Life Insurance Company v. James

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois
DecidedApril 21, 2023
Docket1:22-cv-03194
StatusUnknown

This text of Primerica Life Insurance Company v. James (Primerica Life Insurance Company v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. James, (N.D. Ill. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

PRIMERICA LIFE INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 1:22-cv-03194 ) v. ) Judge Franklin U. Valderrama ) RACHEL JAMES, JAMELLE D. JAMES, ) Magistrate Judge Beth W. Jantz individually and as Independent ) Administrator of the ESTATE OF ) ROBERT L. JAMES, JR., ROBERT L. ) JAMES LLC, and ROBERT JAMES LLC, ) ) Defendants. )

PRIMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY’S AGREED MOTION FOR FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER IN INTERPLEADER

Plaintiff Primerica Life Insurance Company (“Primerica”), by its attorneys, Julie F. Wall and Kaitlyn E. Luther of Chittenden, Murday & Novotny LLC, states as follows for its Agreed Motion for Final Judgment Order in Interpleader: 1. On June 17, 2022, Primerica filed its Complaint for Interpleader pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 22 and 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1335, 1397, and 2361 to resolve competing claims to the proceeds of a life insurance policy, designated Policy No. 0490816355, insuring the life of Robert L. James, Jr. (Doc. No. 1). 2. The Defendants to the Complaint for Interpleader were Rachel James and Jamelle James, individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Robert L. James, Jr. 3. On July 13, 2022, the Court granted Primerica’s motion to deposit its admitted liability under Policy No. 0490816355 with the Court. (ECF Doc. No. 11). 4. On July 20, 2022, Primerica deposited its admitted liability under Policy No. 0490816355 in the amount of $655,930.14, representing the death benefit under Policy No. 0490816355 plus accrued interest, into the Registry of this Court, subject to this Court’s further order as to whom among the Defendants is entitled to receive those proceeds. See Notice of Electronic Filing attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 1.

5. On July 13, 2022, Primerica filed the Waiver of the Service of Summons it received from counsel for Jamelle James, individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Robert L. James, Jr. (Doc. Nos. 12-13). On September 1, 2022 and September 2, 2022, counsel for Jamelle James, individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Robert L. James, Jr., filed appearances. (Doc. Nos. 17, 20). On September 13, 2022, Jamelle James, individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Robert L. James, Jr., filed his Answer to Complaint. (Doc. No. 21). 6. On August 27, 2022, Primerica served a copy of the Summons and Complaint for Interpleader on Rachel James via abode service. (Doc. No. 19).

7. On September 16, 2022, Primerica filed its Amended Complaint for Interpleader, with leave of Court, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 22 and 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1335, 1397, and 2361 to resolve competing claims to the proceeds of two life insurance policies, designated Policy No. 0490816355 and Policy No. 0491474717, insuring the life of Robert L. James, Jr. (Doc. No. 25). 8. The Defendants to the Amended Complaint for Interpleader were Rachel James, Jamelle James, individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Robert L. James, Jr., Robert L. James LLC, and Robert James LLC. 9. On October 18, 2022, Primerica deposited its admitted liability under Policy No. 0491474717 in the amount of $361,356.59, representing the death benefit under Policy No. 0491474717 plus accrued interest, into the Registry of this Court, subject to this Court’s further order as to whom among the Defendants is entitled to receive those proceeds. See Notice of Electronic Filing attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit 2.

10. On September 20, 2022, Primerica served a copy of the Summons and Amended Complaint for Interpleader on Robert L. James LLC by certified mail on the Illinois Secretary of State because it is a dissolved limited liability company. (Doc. No. 29). 11. On September 24, 2022, Primerica served a copy of the Amended Complaint for Interpleader and Motion to Deposit on Rachel James via abode service. (Doc. No. 30). 12. On November 7, 2022, Jamelle James, individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Robert L. James, Jr., filed his Answer to the Amended Complaint for Interpleader. (Doc. No. 33). 13. On November 22, 2022, Primerica requested entry of default against Rachel James

and Robert L. James LLC. (Doc. No. 34). On December 15, 2022, the Clerk of Court granted Primerica’s Request for Entry of Default as to Rachel James and Robert L. James LLC. (Doc. No. 39). 14. On December 13, 2022, Primerica filed its Agreed Motion to Dismiss Robert James LLC Due to Disclaimer of Policy Rights. (Doc. No. 36). On December 15, 2022, the Court entered Primerica’s Agreed Order Disclaiming Funds and Dismiss Robert James LLC with Prejudice. (Doc. No. 38). 15. On January 3, 2023, Primerica moved for default judgment against Rachel James and Robert L. James LLC. (Doc. No. 41). On April 6, 2023, the Court entered an Order for Default Judgment Against Defendants Rachel James and Robert L. James LLC. (Doc. Nos. 43-44, 46). 16. Defendant Jamelle James, individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Robert L. James, Jr., is the only remaining claimant to the proceeds of Policy No.

0490816355 and Policy No. 0491474717. 17. Defendant Jamelle James, individually and as Independent Administrator of the Estate of Robert L. James, Jr., has agreed to the relief sought in this Agreed Motion for Final Judgment Order in Interpleader and that Primerica should be awarded $20,000.00, representing a portion of its actual court costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with prosecuting the Complaint for Interpleader and Amended Complaint for Interpleader, to be deducted from the amount deposited with the Court. 18. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this cause and over the parties. 19. This cause meets the jurisdictional requirements for an interpleader under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 22 and 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) and under to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1335, 1397, and 2361. The amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Plaintiff and Defendants are of diverse citizenship and at least one of the Defendants was diverse from the other Defendants. 20. Primerica has done all that is required by law to perfect its interpleader action. 21. Primerica has a real and reasonable fear of multiple liability that is more than minimal. See Aaron v. Mahl, 550 F.3d 659, 663 (7th Cir. 2008).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. James, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/primerica-life-insurance-company-v-james-ilnd-2023.