FEDERAL · 28 U.S.C. · Chapter 85
Interpleader
28 U.S.C. § 1335
Title28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Chapter85 — DISTRICT COURTS; JURISDICTION
This text of 28 U.S.C. § 1335 (Interpleader) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
28 U.S.C. § 1335.
Text
(a)The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action of interpleader or in the nature of interpleader filed by any person, firm, or corporation, association, or society having in his or its custody or possession money or property of the value of $500 or more, or having issued a note, bond, certificate, policy of insurance, or other instrument of value or amount of $500 or more, or providing for the delivery or payment or the loan of money or property of such amount or value, or being under any obligation written or unwritten to the amount of $500 or more, if
(1)Two or more adverse claimants, of diverse citizenship as defined in subsection (a) or (d) of section 1332 of this title, are claiming or may claim to be entitled to such money or property, or to any one or m
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Republic of Philippines v. Pimentel
553 U.S. 851 (Supreme Court, 2008)
John Patterson v. Roy Stovall, William P. Corkill, Objectors-Appellants
528 F.2d 108 (Seventh Circuit, 1976)
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Roger Miller Music, Inc., Shannon Miller Turner
396 F.3d 762 (Sixth Circuit, 2005)
Kitzer v. Phalen Park State Bank of St. Paul
379 F.2d 650 (Eighth Circuit, 1967)
Perlman v. Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC
932 F. Supp. 2d 397 (E.D. New York, 2013)
Stickney v. MUHLENBERG COLL. TIAA-CREF RET. PLAN
896 F. Supp. 412 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1995)
Progressive Casualty Insurance v. Belmont Bancorp
199 F.R.D. 219 (S.D. Ohio, 2001)
Commercial National Bank of Chicago v. Demos
18 F.3d 485 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)
Sun Life Assurance Co. v. Conroy
431 F. Supp. 2d 220 (D. Rhode Island, 2006)
Smith v. Widman Trucking & Excavating, Inc.
627 F.2d 792 (Seventh Circuit, 1980)
Continental Assur. Co. v. Conroy
111 F. Supp. 370 (D. New Jersey, 1953)
Progressive Insurance v. Southern Star International, Inc.
4 Am. Samoa 3d 121 (High Court of American Samoa, 2000)
Federated Life Insurance Company v. Joanis
(W.D. Washington, 2024)
St. Louis Union Trust Co., a Corporation v. Andrew L. Stone, and United States of America, St. Louis Union Trust Co., a Corporation v. Andrew L. Stone, M. Jeanne Stone and United States of America
570 F.2d 833 (Eighth Circuit, 1978)
Jackson National Life Insurance Company v. Baker
(N.D. West Virginia, 2017)
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Woodall
(E.D. Arkansas, 2021)
COLUSA-GLENN PRODUCTION CR. ASS'N v. Phoenix Ins. Co.
145 F. Supp. 844 (N.D. California, 1956)
FUFC, LLC v. Excel Contractors, LLC
(M.D. Louisiana, 2020)
Guillot v. Protti
(M.D. Louisiana, 2020)
In Re: $165,388.23 in Interpleaded Funds
(W.D. Arkansas, 2020)
Source Credit
History
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 931; Pub. L. 109–2, §4(b)(1), Feb. 18, 2005, 119 Stat. 12.)
Editorial Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(26) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 26, as added Jan. 20, 1936, ch. 13, §1, 49 Stat. 1096).
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits in equity"; word "plaintiff" was substituted for "complainant"; and word "judgment" was substituted for "decree," in order to make the language of this section conform with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The words "duly verified" following "in the nature of interpleader," near the beginning of the section, were omitted. Under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure pleadings are no longer required to be verified or accompanied by affidavit unless specially required by statute. Although verification was specially required by section 41(26) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., the need therefor is not apparent.
Provisions of section 41(26)(b) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to venue are the basis of section 1397 of this title. (See, also, reviser's note under said section.)
Subsections (c) and (d) of said section 41(26) relating to issuance of injunctions constitute section 2361 of this title. (See reviser's note under said section.)
Subsection (e) of such section 41(26), relating to defense in nature of interpleader and joinder of additional parties, was omitted as unnecessary, such matters being governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2005—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 109–2 inserted "subsection (a) or (d) of" before "section 1332".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–2 applicable to any civil action commenced on or after Feb. 18, 2005, see section 9 of Pub. L. 109–2, set out as a note under section 1332 of this title.
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §41(26) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §24, par. 26, as added Jan. 20, 1936, ch. 13, §1, 49 Stat. 1096).
Words "civil action" were substituted for "suits in equity"; word "plaintiff" was substituted for "complainant"; and word "judgment" was substituted for "decree," in order to make the language of this section conform with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The words "duly verified" following "in the nature of interpleader," near the beginning of the section, were omitted. Under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure pleadings are no longer required to be verified or accompanied by affidavit unless specially required by statute. Although verification was specially required by section 41(26) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., the need therefor is not apparent.
Provisions of section 41(26)(b) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., relating to venue are the basis of section 1397 of this title. (See, also, reviser's note under said section.)
Subsections (c) and (d) of said section 41(26) relating to issuance of injunctions constitute section 2361 of this title. (See reviser's note under said section.)
Subsection (e) of such section 41(26), relating to defense in nature of interpleader and joinder of additional parties, was omitted as unnecessary, such matters being governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments
2005—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 109–2 inserted "subsection (a) or (d) of" before "section 1332".
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–2 applicable to any civil action commenced on or after Feb. 18, 2005, see section 9 of Pub. L. 109–2, set out as a note under section 1332 of this title.
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
28 U.S.C. § 1335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/usc/28/1335.