PRIETO v. BRINKLEY

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANDRE PRIETO : CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 19-4850 JUDGE GENECE E. BRINKLEY, et al.

ORDER AND NOW, this 28" day of July 2020, upon careful and independent consideration of the amended Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 4), Response to the Petition (ECF Doc. No. 8), Respondent’s Supplements (ECF Doc. No. 12-1 to 12-7), and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED: 1. We DENY and DISMISS the amended Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (ECF Doc. No. 4) with prejudice; 3. We DENY a certificate of appealability;! and, 4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

' See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).