Prieto Automotive, Inc. v. Volvo Car USA, LLC
This text of Prieto Automotive, Inc. v. Volvo Car USA, LLC (Prieto Automotive, Inc. v. Volvo Car USA, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PRIETO AUTOMOTIVE, INC., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01085-NODJ-EPG 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF 12 v. DEFENDANT RICHARD AARON ONLY 13 VOLVO CAR USA, LLC, et al., (ECF No. 73) 14 Defendants. 15 16 On March 7, 2024, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing all claims against only 17 | Defendant Richard Aaron with prejudice and with each party to bear their own costs and attorney 18 || fees. (ECF No. 73). In light of the parties’ stipulation, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) □□□□ the case 19 | against only Defendant Richard Aaron has been dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear 20 | their own costs and attorney fees. See Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 21 | 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate Richard Aaron as a 22 | pending defendant on the docket. 73 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 | Dated: __March 8, 2024 [Je hey 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Prieto Automotive, Inc. v. Volvo Car USA, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/prieto-automotive-inc-v-volvo-car-usa-llc-caed-2024.